01/01/2026
My coworker asked me the other day what my dissertation was about. What sort of nerd was I. I have been thinking about my answer to her over the last couple of days, because I gave her the 3 second version due to customers.
The 3 second version: I study visitor experience and interpretation, but also clothing, because clothing is our intimate understanding of the spaces we inhabit and interpret.
What does that mean in a broader context? Well, as humans, we build spaces that are comfortable to our bodies. From the clothing we wear, to the houses we live in. Its all about how the body experiences life in those spaces. When living history interpreters deal with the “Aren’t you hot in that?” question, we have to stop for a second and think…often times, everyone is hot, it’s a hot day. Other times though, because we are wearing the clothing that was designed to be worn in the historic spaces we are interpreting, we are actually more comfortable than the visitor. I am personally more uncomfortable when my clothing doesn’t work as it should, than I am due to weather, either historically, or modernly.
Also, how do humans interact with spaces? Interpreting in a historic setting can be easy when the material culture is correct. The interps just live in the space and it becomes better interpretation because of that living. The same goes for clothing. If you build the clothes for the interpreter the way clothing was made, and it has the correct fit, it is only going to develop that perfect patina of heritage through wearing. Our bodies make the interpretation work far better than anything we can do to manually distress clothing.
So I guess my thesis is, build everything as correctly as we can for the period, and then put a body in it. Only then will we achieve really great interpretation.