10/06/2026
OATS or Indoor Anechoic Chamber — which one should engineers choose?
Both are established approaches for radiated RF and EMC measurements, but they create controlled test environments in different ways.
An Open Area Test Site (OATS) uses an outdoor controlled area, typically with a conductive ground plane and defined measurement geometry.
An indoor anechoic chamber combines RF shielding and absorbers to create a controlled electromagnetic environment with reduced external interference and reflections.
But there is one important point:
The facility name alone does not determine measurement quality.
Engineers should evaluate:
✔ Applicable test standard
✔ Frequency range
✔ Measurement distance
✔ Equipment dimensions
✔ Antenna configuration
✔ Site validation
✔ Measurement uncertainty
✔ Future testing requirements
A properly validated OATS can provide reliable measurements. A properly designed anechoic chamber can provide a highly controlled and repeatable environment.
The right decision starts with the measurement requirement—not simply the construction type.
Diamond Microwave Chambers Ltd helps organisations evaluate and develop RF and EMC test environments around their actual testing requirements.
Read blog: https://www.dmcrf.com/oats-vs-indoor-anechoic-chambers/