09/03/2026
Thunder Bay Musicians should get paid because music is work—not a favour, hobby, or decorative background noise.
A musician can spend thousands of hours learning an instrument, developing a voice, rehearsing, learning material, buying and maintaining equipment, travelling, loading gear, soundchecking, performing, and tearing everything down afterward. The audience sees a three-hour show. They don’t see the 10–20 years it took to become good enough to deliver it.
And somehow musicians are routinely expected to accept compensation that would be considered ridiculous in almost any other skilled profession.
A plumber gets paid for expertise.
An electrician gets paid for expertise.
A DJ gets paid.
The sound company gets paid.
Security gets paid.
The bartender gets paid.
The venue sells drinks.
The promoter sells tickets.
Then somebody looks at the band and says, “Think of the exposure.”
Exposure doesn’t buy strings. It doesn’t replace drumheads. It doesn’t put fuel in the van. It doesn’t pay for a $3,000 guitar, $2,000 amplifier, $1,000 microphone, PA equipment, rehearsals, insurance, transportation, or the countless hours spent becoming competent.
More importantly, the musicians are often the product people actually came to experience.
Take away the band and you’ve got a room.
Put a great band in that room and suddenly you’ve got an event.
Music creates atmosphere. It keeps customers in establishments longer. It sells alcohol and food. It attracts crowds. It creates memories. It gives venues content to advertise. It gives festivals their identity.
Stop asking musicians to subsidize everyone else’s business with their talent.
If someone is good enough that you want them performing at your venue, festival, wedding, corporate event, bar, or community celebration, they’re good enough to be paid properly.
And “they love doing it” isn’t an argument against paying them.
Your mechanic might love cars.
You still pay the mechanic.