14/08/2026
I think it’s crucial to begin by making one thing abundantly clear: the post that prompted all this was written by me, and I stand entirely behind every word of it. That post was a considered critique, rooted in a sincere concern for the way Britain’s ancient sites and cultural heritage are sometimes approached by certain modern practitioners. I believe that genuine respect and understanding are essential when dealing with sacred sites and historical traditions, and I have long felt that these elements are often lacking in some contemporary expressions of Druidry. My critique was aimed at those who, in my view, often treat these sites as props for performative rituals or superficial role-playing, rather than recognising their true significance. I firmly believe that our heritage deserves more than surface-level engagement; it calls for reverence, responsibility, and a deeper understanding. It’s about acknowledging that these sites are not merely tourist attractions or theatrical stages but are the remnants of our ancestors’ spiritual and cultural worlds, deserving of respect and care. To call this colonial is a disgusting attack, and shows a lack of understanding. If your goal is to foster understanding and promote respect for our shared cultural and spiritual heritage, I would humbly suggest that such inflammatory rhetoric is counterproductive. Instead of engaging in personal insults or inflammatory accusations, it would be far more productive to approach these discussions with maturity, patience, and a genuine willingness to listen.
Moreover, I want to be clear that the subsequent personal attacks directed at me and Malphas & Co as a whole, are utterly unacceptable. Targeting an established business with baseless insults, attempting to discredit their character, or engaging in online harassment is not only deeply unprofessional but also damaging to the very fabric of respectful discourse. Such behaviour diminishes your credibility and casts doubt on the sincerity of your claims. We all have a responsibility, especially when discussing matters of cultural and spiritual significance, to conduct ourselves with dignity and respect. I am fully prepared to stand by my words and defend my position, but I will not tolerate being targeted or bullied through petty insults or online abuse. If anything, these actions highlight a lack of maturity and a failure to engage seriously with the issues at hand. Respect, after all, is a two-way street, and it is essential that we treat each other, regardless of differences, with civility and dignity.
While I acknowledge that my initial response was direct and perhaps confrontational, I believe that honest critique and open debate are vital tools for addressing the complex issues surrounding our heritage. I have always believed that these topics deserve frank discussion, but such dialogue must also be rooted in mutual respect. My concern is that some modern practices, whether driven by ignorance, recklessness, or a desire for attention, can cause harm, both physically to our sacred sites and culturally to the traditions we seek to preserve. These are serious matters. Our ancient monuments are not playgrounds for theatrical displays, nor should they be used as stages for superficial rituals that disrespect their true significance. I remain committed to engaging in meaningful conversations about these issues, but I insist that they be conducted in an atmosphere of civility and mutual understanding. We all share a responsibility to ensure that our heritage is treated with the reverence it deserves, and that requires mature dialogue, not petty disputes or inflammatory rhetoric.
To finish, I want to emphasise that I am genuinely open to dialogue. I am interested in honest, respectful conversations that can bring about mutual understanding and help us all to better appreciate the importance of our shared cultural and spiritual history. I believe that progress can only be achieved if we approach these discussions with humility, patience, and a willingness to listen. My hope is that, moving forward, we can focus on the real issues: protecting our sacred sites, honouring our ancestors, and fostering a cultural environment where genuine respect and understanding can flourish. We all have a part to play in how Britain’s ancient heritage is represented, preserved, and understood, and I believe that the path to doing so lies in mature, civilised conversation. If we can do that, I am confident that we can find common ground and work towards a future where respect for our history and traditions is at the centre of all our actions.