Tyneside Online

Tyneside Online 💙 Tyneside’s community platform | 📰 Local news | ⚓ Ship Watch | 🎉 Events | 📸 Photos | 📍 Newcastle, Gateshead, North & South Tyneside
(2)

South Shields Man broke pensioner's wrist and back with 'despicable' pushA South Shields man who broke a 78-year-old wom...
29/09/2026

South Shields Man broke pensioner's wrist and back with 'despicable' push

A South Shields man who broke a 78-year-old woman's wrist and back when he pushed her over, causing a "devastating" decline in her dementia, has been jailed for two and a half years.

Dean McLellan, 38, shoved the woman shortly after she appeared to give him money to buy something from a corner shop, Newcastle Crown Court heard.

The victim's daughter said her mother previously enjoyed life but had undergone a "massive change" because of the attack, adding: "Mam is not the happy person she was."

McLellan, of no fixed abode, whose previous convictions included robbery, admitted inflicting grievous bodily harm.

Although she had Alzheimer's disease, the victim was still able to live alone with the support of regular carer visits and make daily outings, including to a corner shop in Hebburn, prosecutor Richard Herrmann said.

On 23 June she encountered McLellan, whom she did not know, who was with a woman and child in a pushchair outside the store, the court heard.

McLellan, who was shirtless and carrying a bottle, spoke to the woman and CCTV footage showed her giving him something, believed to be money, the court heard.

He went into the shop to make some purchases while the victim stayed outside talking to the woman and young child, the court was told.

The woman with McLellan was seen to hug the victim, with their conversation appearing to be "perfectly friendly and good-natured", Herrmann said.

The victim was in front of the pushchair talking to the child when McLellan came back outside, the court heard.

Suddenly, "without any apparent warning", McLellan forcefully shoved the woman, causing her to fall backwards on to the ground, with the attacker heard to swear and say "out of my way", the court heard.

"The assault was wholly unprovoked, unjustified and unjustifiable," Herrmann said.

McLellan was "utterly unconcerned" about the condition of the victim and walked away "without making any effort to see how [she] was", while his companion stayed to try to help the woman, the court heard.

The victim was taken to hospital where she was found to have a broken right wrist and fracture to one of the vertebrae in her spine, the court was told.

'Caused unreal pain'
The victim's daughter told the court the "unprovoked" attack on a "vulnerable elderly lady" left her feeling "angry, sickened and traumatised" on behalf of her mother.

Her mother's life had been "enjoyable", she said, involving a lot of socialising and "plenty of fresh air and exercise".

But she could not now even hold a cup of tea or bathe herself, was in pain if she sat too long and struggled to walk, the court heard.

She was also too "frightened" to go outside.

"I have seen a massive change," the woman said, adding: "Mam is not the happy person she was."

Her dementia had "become more advanced" with the injuries "life-changing" and "life-limiting", the woman's daughter said.

"We all feel devastated by this one person's actions," the woman said, adding: "The pain he has caused is unreal."

In mitigation, the court heard McLellan, who had 21 offences on his criminal record including for robbery, violence and domestic abuse, accepted pushing the woman had been a "frankly horrid" and "mean" act.

'Shame on you'
Judge Thomas Moran said any right-thinking people would say "what sort of person" could "forcefully push" an "obviously frail and vulnerable elderly lady".

He said before the attack the woman was an "active, friendly sociable person able to live independently", with her good nature shown by the "pleasant exchange" she had with McLellan's companion.

Then, when the woman was "lying in agony on the floor", McLellan was "totally uninterested" and "callously casually went on" his way, the judge said.

"Shame on you for such despicable behaviour", the judge told McLellan, adding the woman's "very active social life" had been brought to "an end" by the attack.

Feeling a little peckish? 😋 Fancy something to get you through the afternoon 🤔You can order locally from Phat Mama’s and...
29/09/2026

Feeling a little peckish? 😋 Fancy something to get you through the afternoon 🤔

You can order locally from Phat Mama’s and have it delivered to your door in under 60 minutes.

Discover Phat Mama’s in South Shields for breakfasts, burgers, loaded fries, deli food, homemade pies, catering and local delivery across South Tyneside.

Good morning, South Tyneside! Happy Monday ☕️Please don’t pay too much attention to our Weather page today. There’s a li...
28/09/2026

Good morning, South Tyneside! Happy Monday ☕️

Please don’t pay too much attention to our Weather page today. There’s a little bug we need to fix. Apparently it was 11°C and sunny at 1am this morning. ☀️🌙

Unless the sun’s started doing night shifts, we’re fairly sure it meant clear skies. 😂

We’ll get it sorted. In the meantime, hope your Monday starts better than our weather forecast!

26/09/2026

😂 WELL… THAT ESCALATED QUICKLY!

Good afternoon and happy Saturday everyone 👋

As you may have noticed one of our posts got a little bit… deep. 😂

It actually started out of frustration after reading about the proposed closures of Stanley’s. It hit a bit of a raw nerve, so we started digging. Then we dug a bit more. Then a bit more…

And before we knew it, we were several hours deep into reports, figures, funding, consultations and all sorts, looking at what could potentially be done differently if things were approached another way. 🤦‍♂️😂

Anyway… politics is something South Tyneside Online will mostly be avoiding from here on out. 😂

That doesn’t mean YOU have to though. We’ll always be happy for people to have their say and discuss what’s happening locally. Our new www . south-tyneside (dot com) website now features local news, weather, events and more and you can even submit your own stories and events to be included.

Meanwhile…

🔎 THE SEARCH FOR BRIAN / BRYAN DIXON CONTINUES!

We genuinely thought we’d found him yesterday. We had a lead, went out to visit… and unfortunately it wasn’t our Brian. 😭😂

So next stop: The Shack.

If Brian is still around South Tyneside, we reckon either he’ll have been in there or somebody there will know exactly who we’re talking about. 😂

We’re not giving up yet!

And just to bring things back to normal after that post… 😂

Here’s a little video we took down on the Tyne the other day of a couple of little boats arriving. 🚢🌊

Nothing controversial.
No funding reports.
No council documents.

Just boats. 😂

Have a cracking Saturday everyone! ❤️

Thanks for being a top engager and making it onto my weekly engagement list! 🎉Natalie Mckee, Robert Fleming, Andrew McKe...
24/09/2026

Thanks for being a top engager and making it onto my weekly engagement list! 🎉

Natalie Mckee, Robert Fleming, Andrew McKeown ❤️

24/09/2026

CUTS START AT HOME

South Tyneside families are losing Stanley’s — so residents deserve to know what savings are being made at the top.

South Tyneside Council says ‘Difficult decisions have to be made’

This week those words became very real for local families after the decision to close all 10 Stanley’s nurseries.

Parents are losing childcare they rely upon. Nursery workers face losing their jobs. The council says the service is financially unsustainable and that it must confront the financial pressures facing the borough.

But South Tyneside Online believes there is another conversation the borough deserves to have.

If we’re asking ordinary residents and frontline workers to tighten their belts, what is being cut at the top?

This isn’t a The Labour Party question.

It isn’t a Reform UK - South Shields question.

It isn’t about scoring political points.

It is a South Tyneside Council question.

Previous Labour administrations controlled the authority while many of today’s financial pressures developed. The current Reform administration now controls the council and has made the final decision to close Stanley’s.

So let’s look at the council itself.

Official council documents have listed the Chief Executive salary at £176,386 a year.

Director posts were listed at £118,722 to £130,394.

One Head of Service post was listed at £100,134.

Meanwhile, the council’s published median employee salary was £27,711.

The council has a justification for that difference: it says senior salaries reflect the responsibilities of those jobs and must be sufficient to recruit and retain appropriate senior officers.

That’s an argument residents should hear.

But residents are also entitled to question it.

Because the council’s audited accounts reveal something else.

For the senior officers individually disclosed in its 2023/24 accounts, salary and allowances came to just over £1.013 million, with another £145,686 in employer pension contributions.

Total remuneration: £1.159 million.

That doesn’t mean £1.159m could simply be removed — the council still needs senior management.

But when nurseries are being described as unaffordable, surely it is reasonable to ask whether the structure above frontline services has undergone the same scrutiny.

And elected councillors shouldn’t be excluded from that conversation.

South Tyneside has 54 councillors. A 2025 regional council comparison recorded the basic South Tyneside councillor allowance at £8,463. That alone would equate to roughly £457,000 across 54 councillors, before additional responsibility allowances and eligible expenses.

So we’re asking South Tyneside Council:

Show us that cuts really do start at home.

Show residents the current cost of the senior management structure.

Show us how many employees receive remuneration above £100,000.

Show us what councillors receive in basic and special-responsibility allowances.

Show us the expenses.

Show us the travel and accommodation.

Show us the conference expenditure.

Show us the external consultancy bill.

Show us agency and interim-management expenditure.

Show us exit packages.

And show us what attempts have been made to reduce each of those costs before frontline services disappear.

Because this isn’t about claiming that the Chief Executive should literally be paid minimum wage.

Running a metropolitan council carrying responsibility for children’s services, social care and hundreds of millions of pounds of public money is plainly different from an ordinary minimum-wage job.

It’s about shared sacrifice.

If South Tyneside’s finances are sufficiently serious that ten nurseries must close, residents are entitled to ask whether those occupying the highest-paid positions and those making the decisions have also been asked to make savings.

There is another figure that needs clarification.

Reform UK South Shields says Stanley’s has been running at a loss of £1.1m over three years.

Other reporting of comments made by Cllr Michelle Fascione has described the council subsidy as approximately £1.1m a year.

Those statements appear materially different.

Which figure is correct?

And Reform’s statement says the authority inherited approximately £750m of debt.

Again, residents deserve more than a headline number.

How much is borrowing associated with long-term capital assets? How much relates to housing? What are the annual financing costs? When was the borrowing incurred? What proportion is attributable to decisions made by successive administrations?

Calling something “£750m debt” without that context doesn’t tell residents what the council’s actual financial position is.

South Tyneside Online isn’t asking residents to support Labour, Reform or anybody else.

We’re asking residents to support transparency.

If services have to be cut, publish the numbers and demonstrate that every realistic saving has been explored — from the council chamber and executive offices downwards — before the axe reaches children, families and frontline services.

We want to hear from you

Do you work, or have you previously worked, for South Tyneside Council?

Are you a Stanley’s parent or member of staff?

Have you seen expenditure inside the authority that you believe deserves closer public scrutiny?

Or do you think senior salaries and councillor allowances are justified and that reducing them wouldn’t make a meaningful difference to the council’s financial problems?

We want to hear both sides.

In the meantime we will continue examining the council’s published accounts, spending records and financial plans — and we’ll publish what we find.

🇳🇱❤️ CAN BOLDON HELP REUNITE TWO FRIENDS AFTER MORE THAN 60 YEARS?We received an email this morning from 79-year-old Ber...
24/09/2026

🇳🇱❤️ CAN BOLDON HELP REUNITE TWO FRIENDS AFTER MORE THAN 60 YEARS?

We received an email this morning from 79-year-old Bert Albers in the Netherlands, and after doing a little digging ourselves, we really want to see if South Tyneside can help him.

Bert is searching for an old childhood friend:

🔎 Brian or Bryan Dixon
📍 Boldon Colliery
🏠 Bert remembers his address as 2 Hubert Street
🎂 Born around 1947
🏫 Likely at school in the Boldon area around 1960

Their story actually begins more than 400 miles away from Boldon.

Around 1960, when the boys were about 13, Bert was living in Dieren in the Netherlands.

A group of British schoolchildren were visiting the Netherlands and Bert met Brian/Bryan at the outdoor swimming pool in Dieren.

The two became friends.

Even after Brian returned to Boldon Colliery, they continued writing letters to each other for another three or four years, eventually losing contact around 1964.

And that was that.

Until now.

More than 60 years later, Bert hasn't forgotten his friend.

He's now 79 and contacted South Tyneside Online hoping that somebody here might remember Brian/Bryan — or perhaps even remember the trip itself.

So we started digging.

We have confirmed that Hubert Street was part of Boldon Colliery long before 1960, so Bert's memory of the street certainly fits the period.

But something else caught our attention.

Archive catalogues show surviving records from Boldon Colliery Secondary Modern School covering 1947–1961 — exactly the period we're interested in.

So we'd particularly love to hear from anyone who attended Boldon Colliery Secondary Modern School around 1958–1961.

Does anyone remember:

🇳🇱 A school trip to Holland/The Netherlands around 1960?

🏊 Visiting Dieren or going to an outdoor swimming pool while there?

👦 A schoolmate called Brian or Bryan Dixon?

🏠 The Dixon family living at or around 2 Hubert Street?

Even the smallest memory could help.

Maybe you were at school with him.

Maybe your mam, dad, grandparents, aunt or uncle knew the Dixon family.

Maybe somebody still has an old school photograph tucked away in a drawer.

And perhaps, somewhere in South Tyneside, somebody reading this actually went on that trip to the Netherlands.

Bert isn't looking for anything other than discovering what happened to the friend he made as a 13-year-old boy — and, if Brian/Bryan is still with us, hopefully saying hello again after more than six decades.

❤️ This is where our community can help.

Please share this, particularly with Boldon, East Boldon, West Boldon and Boldon Colliery families and anyone old enough to remember the area in the late 1950s and early 1960s.

If you recognise the story or have information, message South Tyneside Online privately. We'll happily pass genuine information on to Bert rather than anyone posting somebody's personal details publicly.

Let's see if South Tyneside can solve this one. 🇬🇧🤝🇳🇱

Were you a Boldon schoolchild in 1960? This might be the memory that brings two old friends back together.

🐾 NEW TO SOUTH TYNESIDE FROM TOMORROW! 🥩🚚Prime Raw Dog Food can now be ordered online and delivered straight to your doo...
24/09/2026

🐾 NEW TO SOUTH TYNESIDE FROM TOMORROW! 🥩🚚

Prime Raw Dog Food can now be ordered online and delivered straight to your door throughout South Tyneside!

🥩 454g Prime Raw from £1.20
📦 Mix & Match Box Deals available
⚡ Order before 3pm for SAME-DAY delivery
🌙 Order after 3pm and we'll deliver NEXT DAY

No more lugging boxes of frozen raw food home — choose what you need, order online and we'll bring it to you. 🐶

👉 Order Prime Raw Online Shopping

fans

Not a very nice evening in South Tyneside :-(  fans
23/09/2026

Not a very nice evening in South Tyneside :-(
fans

STANLEYs: tonight was one of the most depressing meetings I’ve sat through since becoming a councillor.

Cabinet has now decided to close all ten STANLEY Daycare Nurseries.

I expected to disagree with the decision. What I didn’t expect was to come away feeling quite so insulted by the process used to reach it.

The questions from Cabinet members appeared staged. The answers from Cllr Fascione appeared equally rehearsed. It felt less like people genuinely testing an enormous decision and more like everyone taking their allotted turn to justify a conclusion that had already been reached.

The public gallery saw it too. Families who have spent months fighting for these nurseries were understandably furious, and I don’t blame them.

Yesterday, councillors from different parties worked together to secure a special Education and Skills Scrutiny meeting because there were still serious questions that needed answering. Questions about the finances, the previous 2019 review, occupancy, SEND, local gaps in childcare provision, whether alternative models had genuinely been exhausted, how hundreds of children would transition into other provision, and why councillors asking for information throughout this process repeatedly ran into the words “need to know”.

Then today we got Cabinet.

We were told again about 107 childcare providers, 97% rated Good or Outstanding and a borough-wide vacancy rate of 28%.

What those headline figures don’t answer is whether there is a suitable place in the right area, for the right age child, with the right hours and the right support.

The Council’s own work identifies localised gaps. It identifies particular pressure around younger children. It acknowledges that overall “sufficiency” does not mean every family can access the provision they actually need.

We were told STANLEYs has averaged around 72% occupancy over five years. I keep hearing that figure presented as though it proves the service has failed.

I hear something different.

I hear that a publicly owned early-years service, employing an experienced workforce and caring for some of the children and families who need support most, is operating at roughly three-quarters capacity.

Instead of asking how we improve it, modernise it, make it more flexible and build on what already works, the answer is to abolish it.

That is a political choice.

The Council has spent an extraordinary amount of energy explaining why it is not legally required to directly provide these nurseries. That was never the real question.

The question was whether South Tyneside should choose to keep providing them.

Tonight I still did not hear a convincing answer as to why it should not.

What really stayed with me afterwards was the difference between the people making this decision and the people who now have to live with it.

Cabinet members cast their votes and go home. Parents went home wondering where their children will go. Staff went home wondering what happens to their jobs.

Families who have built trust with these nurseries over years went home knowing that somebody else has decided that relationship has an expiry date.

I had to look distraught parents in the face tonight.

That is considerably harder than looking at a spreadsheet.

When people in positions of power make decisions like this, they should be absolutely certain they have exhausted every credible alternative first. After everything we have learned during this process, I am not convinced they have.

And after watching tonight’s performance, I’m not convinced Cabinet ever seriously expected to be persuaded otherwise.

Consultation should be capable of changing a proposal. Scrutiny should be capable of changing a proposal. Evidence should be capable of changing a proposal.

Otherwise, what exactly are we asking the public to participate in?

I hope every Cabinet member who voted for this can look themselves in the mirror tonight and honestly say they did everything they possibly could to avoid taking this opportunity away from children and families.

I couldn’t make that claim on the evidence I’ve seen.

The parents, children and staff of STANLEYs deserved better.

And frankly, they deserved better than what they got in that chamber tonight.

💙 A little update from South Tyneside Online…You may have noticed a bit of a rebrand recently, particularly around the s...
22/09/2026

💙 A little update from South Tyneside Online…

You may have noticed a bit of a rebrand recently, particularly around the shopping side of South Tyneside Online, so we wanted to explain why.

When we originally built STO, it was designed specifically for South Tyneside — giving local independent businesses somewhere to be discovered, sell online and reach local customers.

But something happened that we hadn't expected…

Businesses from outside South Tyneside started contacting us.

Some were nearby, others much further afield, asking if they could join the platform, sell their products or advertise with us.

The problem was, we hadn't built it for that.

So we went away, rebuilt parts of the platform to work on a much bigger scale — and it's working.

🛍️ That's why our wider shopping marketplace is becoming ONLINE SHOPPING – Shop Independent. Shop Online.

There's another side to the story too.

We've had some fantastic support here in South Tyneside, and we're incredibly grateful to the businesses that believed in what we were trying to do.

But some local businesses and community organisations, local pages and groups etc have also made it very clear they don't want to engage with us, and some have been openly against what we've built.

Nobody has to join us, of course. But we genuinely believe communities work better when local businesses support, communicate and collaborate with each other rather than automatically seeing something new to help as a threat.

Hopefully, in time, some of those businesses will see what we're actually trying to achieve. Our door remains open. 💙

Ironically, while some doors locally were closing, businesses from elsewhere were knocking on ours — and that helped us realise we shouldn't restrict an idea simply because it started in South Tyneside.

So where does that leave South Tyneside Online?

Right here. And more local than ever.

We're developing south-tyneside. com into the local side of what we do — bringing together local news, Weather - South Tyneside, events, travel, sport, Ship Watch, businesses, shopping and useful local information.

🌍 We're also developing City Local, giving businesses across the UK somewhere to advertise and be discovered.

And if you already advertise with South Tyneside Online, don't worry — we'll be moving your advertising profile over to City Local completely FREE of charge. You supported us early on, and we want you to benefit from where we're going next.

So what started as one local idea is becoming three connected platforms:

💙 South Tyneside Online — everything local.
🛍️ Online Shopping — independent businesses selling online across the UK.
📍 City Local — helping businesses advertise and get discovered.

We never originally planned to build three platforms.

We've simply listened to businesses, learned as we've grown and followed where the demand has taken us.

South Tyneside is still our home and always will be.

South Tyneside Online isn't going anywhere — we're just growing beyond it too. 💙 fans

Address

South Shields
NE33 1R

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Tyneside Online posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share