Bargain Bins Halifax, Va

04/27/2026

02/24/2026

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTH BOSTON, VIRGINIA

PROHIBITING LOW-SPEED VEHICLES

22648\8001\13022399v1
WHEREAS, pursuant to Virginia Code § 46.2-908.3, local governing bodies may prohibit the operation of
low-speed vehicles on public highways over which the governing body has control in the interest of
safety and where such prohibition is indicated by conspicuously posted signs.
WHEREAS, “low-speed vehicle” is defined in Virginia Code § 46.2-100 as “any four-wheeled electrically
powered or gas-powered vehicle, except a motor vehicle or low-speed vehicle that is used exclusively
for agricultural or horticultural purposes or a golf cart, whose maximum speed is greater than 20 miles
per hour but not greater than 25 miles per hour and is manufactured to comply with safety standards
contained in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, § 571.500.”
WHEREAS, the operation of low-speed vehicles on public highways within the Town has generated
significant safety concerns, and Town Council has determined that such operation should be prohibited
in order to protect public safety.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF SOUTH BOSTON,
VIRGINIA,
That, in the interests of safety, the operation of low-speed vehicles as defined in Virginia Code § 46.2-
100 is prohibited on public highways within the Town limits.
That the public works department shall conspicuously post signs along the public highways within the
Town limits indicating that the operation of low-speed vehicles is prohibited.
This Ordinance shall be effective _____________.
Adopted this ___ day of _____, 202_.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
County of Halifax
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ____________, 202_ by Edward Owens,
Mayor, and Sarah Lowe, Clerk of Council, for the Town of South Boston, Virginia on behalf of the Town of
South Boston.

_____________________________
(seal) Notary Public

Registration Number: ______________
My Commission Expires: _________________

02/23/2026

Questions & Concerns for the South Boston Town Council Regarding Opposition to Virginia’s LSV Law
1. The Legal Foundation
“Virginia has already legalized Low‑Speed Vehicles statewide. The General Assembly and DMV established the safety standards, equipment requirements, and roadway restrictions.
My first question is:
On what legal or factual basis does the Town Council believe it can override or contradict a law already passed by the Commonwealth?”
2. Evidence-Based Decision Making
“Before voting to prohibit something the state has already approved, what specific data, studies, or documented safety concerns is the Council relying on?
If no such evidence exists, how can a prohibition be justified?”
3. The Chief of Police’s Unexplained Opposition
“The Chief of Police expressed opposition to LSVs but provided no written explanation, no data, and no examples.
Has the Council requested a formal statement outlining his concerns?
If not, how can the Council vote responsibly without understanding the basis of his position?”
4. Consistency With Other Virginia Localities
“LSVs operate legally in towns and cities across Virginia without issue.
What makes South Boston uniquely unable to manage LSVs when other localities with similar road structures and traffic patterns can?”
5. Economic and Community Impact
“Has the Council conducted any analysis on how prohibiting LSVs would affect local businesses, tourism, mobility, and property owners?
If not, why would the Council move toward prohibition without understanding the economic consequences?”
6. Public Input and Transparency
“Has the Council surveyed residents, businesses, or visitors about LSV usage?
If not, how can the Council claim to represent the will of the community on this issue?”
7. Safety Standards Already Established by the State
“LSVs must meet federal safety standards, carry insurance, be titled and registered, and operate only on roads 35 mph and under.
What additional safety concerns does the Council believe exist that the Commonwealth of Virginia did not already address?”
8. Enforcement Concerns
“If enforcement is the issue, what specific challenges does the Police Department anticipate?
Have those challenges been documented, quantified, or compared to enforcement of bicycles, mopeds, or farm equipment that already share the same roads?”
9. Liability and Legal Exposure
“If the Council votes to prohibit a state‑approved vehicle class without evidence, does the Town risk legal challenges for acting arbitrarily or without factual justification?”
10. A Request for Accountability
**“Before any vote is taken, will the Council commit to presenting the public with:
• The data used to justify a prohibition
• The Chief of Police’s written concerns
• Any legal opinions obtained
• Any economic impact analysis
Without these, how can the public trust that the decision is responsible and fact‑based?”**
Optional Closing Statement (Strong & Respectful)
“The Commonwealth of Virginia has already determined that LSVs are safe, regulated, and legal. If the Town of South Boston intends to contradict that decision, the public deserves a clear, evidence‑based explanation. Anything less is not responsible governance.”

02/23/2026

South Boston deserves a Town Council that listens to its residents — not one that makes decisions based on personal preference or behind‑the‑scenes pressure.

07/01/2025

05/31/2025

BOYCOTT AVELO AIRLINES. OVER 30 PEOPLE STUCK AT THE AIRPORT WITH NO ASSISTANCE AT ALL.

05/18/2025

All golf cart and low speed vehicle owners, are you interested in participating in the 4th of July parade in Clarksville?

05/01/2025

LAKEVIEW MOTORS IS HAVING A YARD SALE ON REMAINING BARGAIN BIN ITEMS.
CLOTHES $2.00, SHOES $2.00
TODAY, RIGHT NOW, FIRST COME - FIRST SERVED
CASH ONLY