07/29/2026
Here is the English version with suitable hashtags:
Why did the falsifiers of Egyptian civilization remain silent on this post, despite their intense presence across many others?
Perhaps because this artifact leaves little room for distortion or selective interpretation. The scene is clearly documented by a major international museum, and its meaning is explicit: the lion symbolizes the Egyptian king, while the captive represents a defeated enemy.
The object also does not portray a king’s facial features that could be isolated from their archaeological context and used to provoke an artificial debate over skin colour or identity. Instead, it presents a direct royal symbol expressing power, sovereignty, and victory over Egypt’s enemies.
It appears that some accounts do not engage with every archaeological post. They selectively target only the material they believe can be cropped, distorted, or manipulated to generate controversy.
Their silence does not necessarily indicate agreement. It may simply reveal the absence of a marketable argument when faced with clear archaeological documentation and a direct scholarly interpretation.
