The Gathering: an urban women's market

The Gathering: an urban women's market We're about showcasing women and their wares. It's about being unique with items that are handcrafted, upcycled, repurposed or one of a kind pieces.

09/28/2026
09/14/2026

Men sat in a jail in a war zone for refusing a haircut. Long Binh Jail outside Saigon was built for four hundred and held seven hundred and nineteen by August 1968, with shipping containers used as cells. Black soldiers were eleven percent of the force in Vietnam and more than half the men inside it. Some were there for serious crimes. Some were there for refusing a direct order to get their hair cut.

The order was simple enough. Go and get it cut.

What nobody giving that order had ever worked out was that America had spent half a century selling combs to Black people and had built every single one of them to take the curl out.

What nobody made was a comb that would go through that hair and leave it standing up, and the barber who eventually did something about that, a young man in San Diego named Willie Morrow, remembered what people used instead.

"You know what people would use? Angel food cake cutters."

A cake cutter is a flat steel comb on a handle, sold to slice a sponge cake without crushing it. The tines are long and set wide apart, and in a house with no other option it was the only thing that would go all the way through.

Morrow said children were not allowed to carry them into school. They were long and they were metal and somebody had decided you could hurt a person with one.

So that is the picture. A whole people fixing their hair with a piece of baking equipment their own schools classed as a weapon, because the only tools that industry had ever built for them were tools for turning the hair into something else.

That was the country the United States military was drafting from.

Somewhere on an American base in 1968 a young Black man sits down in a barber's chair and the cape goes over him.

The barber behind him is a civilian on contract. He has been cutting hair for twenty years and has never been taught one thing about the head in front of him, because nowhere in America was that being taught.

He knows one move. He reaches for the clippers.

Morrow explained this to The New York Times in 1971 without any bitterness in it at all, because for a long time the arrangement had suited everybody. Black men had worn their hair cut down close or chemically straightened, so a set of clippers had always been enough.

"That made it easy for the military," he said.

Run the clippers close over a man's head and there was no problem at all. No training, no product, no time, no thought.

Then the middle of the 1960s happened and young Black men stopped taking it off.

They wore it out. They wore it up.

And a set of grooming regulations written by white men for white heads, which had never once had to explain itself, was suddenly being enforced against something it had no language for.

Neat. That was the standard, and the regulation never defined it, and the manual never defined it, and the barber could not have told you.

The men who could have told you were the ones sitting in the chair, and they were being charged a premium for the privilege.

The cut a Black soldier needed was not priced as a haircut. It was written down as a special, and a special carried a higher rate.

So he paid more. He paid a surcharge, in uniform, on his own base, for a worse job from a man who had never been shown how to do it.

We know this because the Army says so. Its own published account of the period records the correction in a single clause, almost in passing, that barbers were to be trained and that soldiers were to be charged the regular price instead of a higher priced special cut.

Read that clause backwards and you have what it was correcting. It takes four seconds to read and everything underneath it took years.

The man in that stockade outside Saigon is nineteen years old and he is in a war.

He is in there because he would not go back and sit down for it one more time.

That is not a grooming dispute. That is a system with a cell at the end of it.

And the men inside that system started to say so, out loud, in numbers, in writing, through every channel the Army had.

The Army did not move because it woke up one morning caring about a young man's head. It moved because the complaints kept coming and because, by 1968, the fighting inside the Army had started to compete with the fighting outside it.

Its own historians are blunt about the language. The internal documents called it "the problem of race," which tells you in four words exactly who the institution understood the problem to belong to.

The response came in pieces. Race relations training, and books by Black authors ordered into the base libraries, and music on the jukeboxes, and a list of products the exchanges were told to stock worldwide, because until then there was nothing on those shelves a Black soldier could put on his own head.

And a barber. One civilian barber, hired to teach the United States military something it had run for nearly two centuries without ever acquiring.

They went and found him in San Diego, and the reason he was findable starts in a cotton field.

Willie Lee Morrow was born on October 9, 1939, in Eutaw, Alabama, one of eight children of Hollie and Olean Morrow, who were sharecroppers. He worked cotton, and he had the arithmetic of his own future worked out young.

The A students got a shot at college. Everybody else got the fields, and he said so plainly for the rest of his life, that without that you were going to be a cotton picker or a brick layer or a sharecropper like the people who raised you.

He started cutting at twelve or thirteen, on his seven brothers and sisters, because they were there and they were free.

Hollie Morrow farmed another man's land and ran bootleg whiskey on the side, and out of the two of those he scraped up the money to send his oldest boy two thousand miles away to barber college.

Think about what that money was, because a sharecropper does not have savings. That was somebody's winter, spent on a bet.

Morrow got to San Diego, lived with an uncle near Thirtieth and Logan, and enrolled at the Independent Barber College downtown on Fifth Avenue.

And the barber college taught him white hair.

The instructors taught the care of Caucasian hair exclusively. A young Black man from Alabama paid his father's whiskey money to be trained in a trade, and the trade's own school declined to teach him the heads he had been cutting since he was twelve.

The same hole the Army would come looking for him about was already in the room he was sitting in.

He graduated in July of 1959 and went home to Alabama with a license in his hand.

He lasted a matter of weeks.

He said afterward that the fields looked harder to him than they had before, and that the sun felt hotter. He had been gone under a year and the place that made him had become a place he could not live in.

That is what a few months of somewhere else will do to a man. He got back on the train.

In San Diego a barber named Horace Smith gave him a job at a shop called Smitty's. Morrow made seventeen dollars his first week and was charging twenty and twenty-five cents a head.

Then Smith offered the shop to his five or six barbers. Every one of them said it was too expensive.

Morrow emptied his savings and paid five thousand dollars for it, and he was still laughing about the price twenty years later.

That shop sat in the middle of a block on Market Street. He would eventually own the whole block.

In 1962 a friend of his named Robert Bell came back from Nigeria carrying a hand-carved comb, the kind made on that continent for thousands of years, with long stiff teeth set wide apart.

Morrow had never held one. Every comb he had ever worked with had been built for hair that lies down.

He started carving copies in the back of the shop. Then he was getting up before dawn to make combs and doing a full day of barbering afterward, and then he worked out how to mould them in plastic.

One day the whole family sat in their own house and packed twelve hundred of them by hand.

By 1965 he had a version he called the Afro p*k. Inside a few years he was moving about twelve thousand a week across seven different models.

He never claimed the idea. He said what he actually did, which was manufacture a thing Africa had made for millennia for a country that had somehow never put one on a shelf.

And then he sat down and wrote the rest of it out, because nobody else had.

The Principles of Cutting and Styling Negro Hair was a technical manual, and he self-published it. There was no publisher in America waiting for a book about how to cut Black hair, so the man who had been refused the education wrote the textbook.

That book is the reason the Pentagon knew his name.

He was not only describing white barbers in it, either, and that is the part that stopped him.

"The Afro caught everybody off guard," he told Ebony in 1970, and he meant his own trade too. He said Black barbers and beauticians across America had been caught short as well, without the knowledge and without much desire to build a decent one.

Four hundred years of an industry organised around getting the curl out had left almost nobody, of any colour, trained to leave it in.

He was not writing to scold anybody. He was writing because the trade had a hole in it and he had decided to be the one who filled it.

In 1969 the Army called.

It had been getting complaints that the barbers on its bases did not know how to handle Black hair. It hired Morrow as a civilian to go and teach them, on installations in something like thirty countries, and the contract ran four years.

He walked out of his own shop and went, and his daughter Cheryl has described what he walked into.

A room on a base. A dozen contract barbers in it, most of them white, several of them men who had been in the trade longer than Morrow had been alive.

And a man not yet thirty, out of Eutaw, Alabama, standing at the front holding up a comb, teaching grown professionals how to hold it.

That was lesson one. How to hold it.

Then how to get the most out of it, how to lift the hair up off the scalp, how to bring it into shape, and only after all of that, how to cut.

Then he taught them the razor.

Shaving a tightly curled beard makes the cut hair curve back and grow into the skin. It produces inflamed bumps and infection and scarring, and it has a clinical name, pseudofolliculitis barbae, and it falls hardest on men with tightly curled hair, which in the American military meant Black men.

The military required a clean shave. It had no exemption to give, so men shaved faces that could not take it, over and over, for years.

Then Admiral Zumwalt relaxed the Navy's rule on beards in 1970, and a study published in 1974 in the Journal of the National Medical Association found the condition had all but vanished from the fleet.

It had not been cured. The rule had been changed, the authors of that study told the other services to change theirs, and the other services kept the rule.

So Morrow stood in those rooms and taught men how to take a blade to a face like his without wrecking it, which is a thing the country had needed for as long as it had been drafting Black men and had never once gone looking for.

He went out to bases across Asia and Europe and the United States, and he went into combat zones. He said he was the only hairstylist the military ever cleared to do that, and Gloria, his wife, went with him on a good many of those trips, including to Africa.

He printed a magazine for the military called Curly Cues, because the workshop ends and the instructor gets on a plane and somebody has to keep teaching after he is gone.

And on January 31, 1971, The New York Times ran a short item on page nineteen reporting that forty-nine military barbers had completed the training.

Forty-nine. Across hundreds of installations, in a military fighting a war, that was the entire first class.

That is not a victory. That is an opening balance.

It took until roughly 1973 for the training to reach across the services with anything like real coverage. Which means there were young Black men who were drafted, served a whole enlistment, and came home having never once sat in a military chair in front of somebody who knew what he was doing.

They were charged the special rate the whole way through.

Morrow came home to Market Street and built the rest of it out of nothing, and San Diego made him do it the hard way.

He perfected a wave process for naturally curly hair in 1975, called it Tomorrow's Curl, renamed it California Curl in 1977, and it turned into the biggest money the Black hair industry had ever seen. By 1981 it was a ten-million-dollar-a-year business.

No bank would lend him a cent.

He put up around two million dollars of buildings on that block and paid for all of it out of cash flow, and he was plain about the reason. It was southeast San Diego, and you did not put millions of dollars into southeast San Diego.

One morning his own bank closed the company's checking account with no warning, and he was still furious about it hours later.

He was not a saint and the record should say so. He fired people hard and fast and humiliated some of them in front of others, and former employees said so on the record in 1981 while he was alive to answer it.

He answered it, at length, and did not apologise.

He built an eighteen-room house on Tooley Street in Encanto, and put up a radio station in 1979 and a newspaper in 1986 above the shop on Market Street.

He kept the red velvet barber chair through all of it. He said you learn everything about a life from the person sitting in it.

The people he wanted in front of him that year were his own. At his birthday party in 1981 he called his mother and father up out of the crowd and put an arm around each of them.

Hollie was working in his son's warehouse by then. Olean was still going out to work as a maid.

The whiskey money had come all the way back.

Willie Morrow died at home in San Diego on June 22, 2022, at eighty-two. Two weeks after the funeral a campaign started to put his name on Morrison Street, on the block where Smitty's had been and where he had earned his seventeen dollars.

It took three years and it did not land on Morrison Street. On October 9, 2025, on what would have been his birthday, a section of Tooley Street was unveiled as Willie Morrow Way, and his widow Gloria stood there holding the sign.

So the record has kept a great deal of this.

It kept the contract and the year and the thirty countries. It kept the patents, the exhibit in Escondido with two hundred and fifty of his objects in it, the red chair behind glass, the street sign, and the four-second clause on the Army's website.

What the record does not have is one name.

Not one soldier who stood at that counter and paid the higher rate. Not one of the men whose complaints are the actual reason the Army picked up a telephone.

There is no list of them, because nobody thought a surcharge was the kind of thing that required a list, and the men paying it were nineteen years old with a war on and were in no position to keep receipts.

So the next time this crosses your feed as a nice story about the Pentagon needing a Black barber, put the price back into it.

Say that a Black soldier was charged extra for a worse haircut, and that there was a cell waiting for him if he said no, and that a sharecropper's son from Eutaw, Alabama was the man the United States had to go out and find.

Then say the other half out loud, the half with no names in it.

They complained first. They paid first.

I put a lot of effort into researching and sharing stories that matter.
If you'd like to support the work, here's the link:
https://ko-fi.com/blackhistorystories
Every coffee helps me keep creating.

09/06/2026

Howard University had a women’s dean because Black women students had demanded one, and Lucy Diggs Slowe made that office far bigger than discipline. She built mentoring, leadership opportunities and women’s residence halls, even while the administration later excluded her from key meetings and questioned her authority.

The contradiction was already there when Slowe arrived in 1922.

Years earlier, Howard’s women students had petitioned for a dean of their own. In 1913, thirty-three young women asked the university for a woman with the education and executive ability to oversee their lives on campus and help them develop as students.

They were not asking for somebody to simply watch them.

They were asking for somebody who understood that Black women entering higher education were navigating a world that wanted their education, their respectability and their obedience to fit neatly into somebody else’s definition of womanhood.

Lucy Diggs Slowe understood the difference.

When she returned to Howard in 1922 as its first full-time Dean of Women, she did not treat the position as a ceremonial title. She studied how women’s deans operated at other universities, developed procedures for Howard, and expanded the office into something closer to a center for student life, leadership and intellectual development.

That mattered because Slowe knew what it meant to build something before anyone was prepared to call it important.

She had graduated from Howard as valedictorian in 1908. While still a student, she helped found Alpha Kappa Alpha, becoming its first president, creating with other Black college women an organization that would become one of the most enduring institutions of Black women’s collective leadership.

Then she took her talents into education.

She earned a master’s degree from Columbia University in 1915 and studied the emerging field of student personnel work. Four years later, Washington, D.C., selected her to organize and lead its first junior high school for Black students.

And somehow, in the middle of all that, she became a champion tennis player.

In 1917, Slowe won the first women’s singles championship of the American Tennis Association. She would eventually win 17 ATA titles, making her one of the outstanding Black athletes of her era.

So when she took the dean’s office at Howard, she was not stepping into leadership for the first time.

She was bringing years of experience into an institution where Black women students had already made it clear that they wanted a voice of their own.

Slowe gave that voice structure.

She established mentoring in place of the older chaperone model, helping freshmen navigate their first year. She pushed for leadership opportunities and student self-government, and she insisted that the welfare of women students belonged within the educational mission of the university rather than at its margins.

Then there was housing.

To Slowe, a dormitory was not simply a building where students slept between classes. She believed where a young woman lived, studied, socialized and learned independence could shape the education she carried into the world.

That belief became concrete in 1931, when three new residence halls for women opened at Howard. The buildings formed what became known as the women’s campus and provided modern housing for hundreds of students.

The new residences were designed around more than beds and hallways.

A contemporary Washington Tribune account described rooms for two students, spaces for gatherings, an infirmary and facilities intended to make the residence halls part of the students’ education and social development. The women themselves also had a system of campus government, with staff members serving as advisers.

Then, in February 1932, some of the most prominent women’s deans in the country came to see what Slowe had built.

More than sixty deans attending a national conference in Washington toured Howard’s new women’s residences. Slowe led them through the buildings, showing visitors a physical expression of the educational philosophy she had been arguing for inside Howard.

There is something almost painful about that scene when you know what was happening inside Howard at the same time.

Outside administrators could look at Slowe’s work and see innovation.

Inside her own university, the president was increasingly treating her authority as something that could be reduced.

The man at the center of that conflict was Mordecai Wyatt Johnson, who became Howard’s president in 1926. Slowe and Johnson disagreed over women’s education, student affairs and the scope of her authority, and their relationship deteriorated over the years that followed.

Then came 1927.

A parent contacted Slowe about Clarence Harvey Mills, a Howard professor, alleging that he had used improper and sometimes vulgar language in class while women students were present. Slowe chose not to turn the matter immediately into a public controversy. Instead, she met with Mills privately and tried to address the complaint within the university.

At first, Mills appeared to accept the conversation.

The next day, he sent Slowe a letter that she later described as vile. The letter did more than dispute the student's complaint. It attacked the character of the student and challenged Slowe's authority as Dean of Women.

That changed the situation.

Slowe took the matter to Dudley Woodard, Mills's supervisor, and eventually to President Johnson. The administration agreed that Mills would leave Howard at the end of the academic year and that there would be no public discussion of the matter.

But Mills did not simply disappear from Howard.

He completed the academic year and received a leave of absence with partial salary while completing his doctorate at the University of Chicago. His departure was therefore considerably less punitive than the initial decision to dismiss him might suggest.

For Slowe, however, the consequences were only beginning.

She later connected the Mills case directly to the deterioration of her relationship with Johnson. In a memorandum, she wrote that from the time the case occurred, she no longer had the president’s cordial support.

Then she put the difference into dollars.

When salaries were raised, Slowe wrote that her increase was $200 while other deans received increases ranging from $850 to $1,150. She also said Johnson excluded her from conferences with the academic deans, despite the fact that the Dean of Women had previously participated in the Board of Deans.

That is the part of her story that can be easy to miss.

The university did not erase her title.

It kept the title and steadily weakened the power attached to it.

Slowe complained about lost autonomy, reduced influence and the administration’s failure to understand the actual work of her office. Later accounts describe Johnson refusing budget requests, removing her from decision-making circles and attempting to narrow her responsibilities.

But Slowe did not respond by making herself smaller.

She kept building.

She organized professional networks for Black women working with students. She participated in national organizations concerned with college women and helped create opportunities for Black women educators to exchange ideas and develop their profession at a time when they were often excluded from the spaces where educational policy was shaped.

Her vision was larger than getting women safely through four years of college.

In her 1933 writing on the higher education of Black women, Slowe argued for an education that prepared Black women for citizenship, leadership and participation in the world beyond the campus. She was asking what a university owed its women students after they walked through the gates.

That question made her difficult to contain.

Because Slowe was not merely asking Howard to protect women.

She was asking Howard to trust Black women with power.

Those are not the same thing.

Protection can keep someone inside a boundary. Leadership teaches them how to decide where the boundary should be.

Slowe wanted women students to develop judgment, independence and the confidence to participate in public life. She believed their education should prepare them not simply to be respectable graduates, but to become people capable of shaping institutions and communities themselves.

And she expected the university to live by the standards it taught.

That is why the Mills complaint mattered beyond one professor and one classroom.

A Black woman student had a complaint. Slowe listened. She investigated it. She attempted to resolve it privately. When the response challenged her own authority, she documented what happened.

The record she left behind allows us to see something that a simple story about a pioneering dean would hide.

Institutions can recognize a person’s talent while resisting the independence that talent produces.

Howard needed Slowe badly enough to create a new position for her, rely on her to organize women’s student life, support the construction of new residence halls and showcase her work to visiting deans.

Yet when she insisted that women’s concerns deserved institutional authority, that same institution could make her fight for a seat at the table.

By 1933, Slowe was taking her complaints about unequal treatment directly to Howard’s Board of Trustees. She remained Dean of Women until her death in 1937, continuing to work even as her relationship with Johnson remained deeply strained.

There is no neat ending to that.

Slowe did not receive the kind of institutional vindication that would make the story comfortable. The man whose conduct sparked the 1927 dispute was able to continue his education and career, while Slowe spent years documenting what she believed had been done to her authority.

But walk back through Howard in 1932.

Look at the women’s residence halls.

Look at the students living in spaces designed with their education, privacy and community in mind. Look at the visiting deans standing beside the new buildings while Slowe, the woman who fought for them, stood among them.

That was her answer.

Not a speech.

Not a title.

A structure.

Something young Black women could walk into, live inside, organize within and carry beyond the campus.

Lucy Diggs Slowe spent the last years of her life fighting an institution that increasingly questioned the reach of her authority, but the work itself kept becoming harder to ignore. She had helped create organizations, professional networks, student leadership structures and a physical campus for Black women, and those things could not be reduced simply because somebody decided she belonged in fewer rooms.

The administration could control the meeting.

It could control the raise.

It could control the invitation.

It could not make the work she had built disappear.

And perhaps that is the detail worth carrying forward: in the record, Slowe's smaller raise was $200.

The residence halls she fought to build still stand as the larger answer.

I spend hours making sure these stories are researched and shared responsibly.
If you’d like to support the work, you can do so here:

https://buymeacoffee.com/blackexcellence
Every coffee truly helps.

Address

754 Broadway
Tacoma, WA
98402

Telephone

(253) 365-6966

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Gathering: an urban women's market posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category