Revisiting the inerrant Bible, a fresh perspective

Revisiting the inerrant Bible, a fresh perspective I have believed absolutely everything in the Bible for 55 years, I have completed 3 Bible schools courses. Now I no longer believe.

I have been a candidate for ministry, preaching everywhere.

05/07/2026

From a strict Torah-only perspective (the Chumash, the first five books of Moses), your point cuts straight to the absolute core of the matter. The institutional arguments about who compiled, guarded, or authorized the New Testament become entirely irrelevant when placed next to the unalterable, eternal constitution established by God at Mount Sinai.

If the terms of the original contract cannot be legally changed, then the history of a subsequent book or church holds no spiritual weight. Here is how the Torah itself addresses and affirms this exact point:

1. The Sinai Covenant Needs No "Definitive" Updates
The post argues that without an institutional church, there would be no "definitive New Testament."

From the perspective of the Torah, the definitive, complete, and final revelation for humanity has already been given. The Torah leaves absolutely no vacancy or "missing pieces" that require a later testament or church council to fill in.

Deuteronomy 30:11-14: Moses explicitly states that the contract is already fully accessible, clear, and complete:

"Now what I am commanding you today is not too difficult for you or beyond your reach... No, the word is very near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart so you may obey it."

Deuteronomy 13:1 (12:32): God places a permanent seal on the legal framework: "See that you do all I command you; do not add to it or take away from it."

If adding to the text is strictly forbidden, then the creation of an entirely new book that alters the laws (such as changing the Sabbath, changing dietary restrictions, or introducing a human intermediary) is a breach of the foundational contract.

2. The Test of History: Empires Vanish, the Torah Stands
The Catholic post stresses the role of their institution in "preserving and safeguarding" their books through history.

However, as we look at the actual historical record, the preservation of the Sinai covenant did not rely on a centralized political empire, a Pope, or a massive world church. The Torah survived despite being targeted for total erasure by the largest empires in world history—including the Roman Empire from which the Western Church emerged.

Leviticus 26:44: God guaranteed this supernatural survival from the very beginning:

"Yet in spite of this, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not reject them or abhor them so as to destroy them completely, breaking my covenant with them; for I am the Lord their God."

The survival of the Sinai laws across thousands of years, without a central human authority or geographical capital, is the ultimate proof that the Creator Himself safeguards His original contract.

3. The Ultimate Rule of Law: God Does Not Renegotiate
The fundamental flaw in the "Church came first" argument is that it treats God’s covenants as if they are fluid, evolving corporate policies that can be managed or superseded by human administrators.

The Torah establishes that God’s word is absolute, unchanging, and grounded in His perfect nature.

Numbers 23:19: "God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of man, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?"

Conclusion
When evaluated purely through the Chumash, debates over who compiled the New Testament are completely secondary. If a later text or institution claims the authority to replace, modify, or bypass the eternal laws given by God to millions of witnesses at Sinai, it flunks the Torah's built-in security test.

The Sinai covenant is the baseline constitution. No matter how many centuries pass, and no matter what books are compiled later by external organizations, the original word spoken out of the fire at Horeb remains the perfect, permanent standard of truth.

05/07/2026

The survival and continuity of the Sinai covenant—anchored in the Torah—is one of the most statistically anomalies in human history. Historically, when a nation is conquered, exiled, and stripped of its homeland, its distinct religious, legal, and cultural identity vanishes within three to four generations as they assimilate into the dominant culture.

Yet, the Sinai covenant has not only survived for over 3,300 years, but it has thrived globally, preserving its exact laws, language, and texts across thousands of miles and centuries of violent opposition.

Here is the overwhelming historical and textual evidence of its endurance.

1. Textual Integrity: The Dead Sea Scrolls vs. Modern Torahs
The most undeniable physical evidence of the Sinai covenant’s preservation is the absolute stability of its text over thousands of years.

In 1947, Bedouin shepherds discovered ancient Hebrew manuscripts hidden in caves near the Dead Sea (Qumran). Among these were scrolls containing parts of the Torah dating back to the 3rd century BCE to 1st century CE.

When historians compared these 2,000-year-old texts to the Masoretic Hebrew text used in modern synagogues today, the results were astonishing: The text was virtually identical.

Despite being hand-copied word-by-word across a hundred generations in different corners of the world (from Morocco to Russia), the text did not mutate, change, or drop commandments.

The meticulous laws of the Sofer (the ritual scribe)—who must copy the Torah scroll under strict rules where a single misformed letter invalidates the entire scroll—insured the absolute preservation of the legal contract made at Sinai.

2. Surviving Global Imperial Crushes (Chronological Continuity)
The Sinai covenant survived deliberate, systematic attempts by the world’s most powerful empires to outlaw, criminalize, and physically erase it.

The Seleucid Empire (Antiochus IV)
167 BCE
The Greek king Antiochus IV criminalized the Sinai covenant. Keeping the Sabbath, practicing circumcision, and possessing the Torah were made capital offenses punishable by death. The Maccabean revolt directly restored the covenantal laws.

The Roman Empire (Hadrianic Decrees)
135 CE
Following the Bar Kokhba revolt, Roman Emperor Hadrian banned the teaching of Torah, observing the Sabbath, and ordained judges under Sinai law. Scholars like Rabbi Akiva were tortured to death for teaching it. Rome fell; the Sinai laws outlived the empire.

The Spanish Inquisition
1492 CE
The Spanish Crown outlawed Judaism completely. Despite systemic torture and executions by burning at the stake (autos-da-fé), thousands of "Crypto-Jews" secretly preserved core Sinai practices (like baking matzah or lighting Friday night candles in hidden basements) for generations.

Soviet Anti-Religious Campaigns
1920s-1980s
The Soviet Union's Yevsektsiya systematically targeted Hebrew education, ritual practices, and Torah study, sending practitioners to Siberian gulags. The underground network kept the Sinai covenant alive until the regime collapsed.

3. The Evidence of Global Legal Uniformity
Perhaps the most striking evidence that the covenant thrived is its global uniformity without a centralized human authority.

For nearly 2,000 years, communities keeping the Sinai covenant were scattered across the globe with zero rapid communication. They were isolated in Yemen, China (the Kaifeng Jews), Ethiopia (Beta Israel), Germany, and North Africa.

They had no Pope, no central council, and no shared political state.

Yet, when these isolated communities finally encountered each other in the 19th and 20th centuries, they were practicing the exact same covenantal laws.

A Jew from Yemen and a Jew from Poland were keeping the exact same Sabbath boundaries, eating according to the exact same dietary laws (Kashrut), and reciting the exact same Shema declaration from Deuteronomy.

This legal uniformity across vast geographical distances proves that the Sinai covenant acted as a self-sustaining, deeply ingrained national constitution that external forces could not fracture.

4. The Torah's Built-In Prediction of its Own Survival
The Torah itself explicitly predicted both the extreme persecution and the supernatural survival of the covenant. In Deuteronomy 31:21, God states that even when the people face catastrophic exile and hardships:

"And when many disasters and calamities come upon them, this song will testify against them, because it will not be forgotten by their descendants."

In Leviticus 26:44, God guarantees that no matter how intense the foreign opposition becomes during exile, the contract cannot be permanently canceled:

"Yet in spite of this, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not reject them or abhor them so as to destroy them completely, breaking my covenant with them; for I am the Lord their God."

The Verdict of History
Every single ancient empire that attempted to crush, replace, or outlaw the Sinai covenant—the Babylonians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Spanish Empire, and the Soviet Union—has vanished into history books. Yet today, millions of people worldwide still read the exact same Hebrew text, keep the exact same Sabbath, and bind themselves to the exact same laws established at the foot of Mount Sinai. It remains the most resilient legal contract in human history.

04/07/2026

From a strict Torah-only perspective (the Chumash, the first five books of the Bible), this post relies on highly speculative math, structural misreadings of Hebrew prophecy, and a theological system completely unaligned with the core contract made at Mount Sinai.

By evaluating these specific claims using only the text of the Torah, the entire Pre-Tribulation Rapture position can be fundamentally refuted point by point:

1. The Premise is Fabricated: The Torah Contains No "7-Year Tribulation"
The text claims that there is a "7-year Tribulation" decreed as corporate punishment for Israel violating Sabbath years.

The Textual Reality: The concept of a specific "7-year global tribulation period" right before a cosmic rescue does not exist anywhere in the Torah.

The Real Sabbath Year Law: The laws regarding the Sabbath year (Shmita) are found in Leviticus 25. In Leviticus 26, God explicitly details the punishments if Israel fails to keep them, which includes exile so the land can enjoy its rests (Leviticus 26:34-35). However, God provides an exact roadmap for how these punishments end. It does not end with a 7-year apocalyptic trap; it ends the moment Israel lowers its pride and returns to the Sinai covenant:

"But if they will confess their sins... then when their uncircumcised hearts are humbled... I will remember my covenant with Jacob and my covenant with Isaac and my covenant with Abraham..." (Leviticus 26:40-42)

The Torah’s system relies entirely on repentance (Teshuvah), not a mandatory, unalterable prophetic timeline built on post-Torah texts.

2. God Rejects the Core Premise of the "Rapture" (Ascending to Heaven)
The post argues that true believers are identified by their eager desire to be "caught up" and escape the earth to meet a savior in heaven. The Torah explicitly rejects the idea that righteousness or spiritual success involves leaving the earth or ascending to heaven.

Deuteronomy 30:11-12 completely deconstructs this:

"Now what I am commanding you today is not too difficult for you or beyond your reach. It is not up in heaven, so that you have to ask, 'Who will ascend into heaven to get it for us...?'"

The Torah sets up a system where holiness is brought down into mundane physical reality—through dietary laws, agricultural rules, criminal justice, and marital ethics. Desiring to escape the physical world is a rejection of the very purpose for which God created humans and placed them on the earth.

3. The Test of Torah: Rejecting Foreign Theology
The post relies entirely on quotes from the New Testament (Timothy, Titus, Thessalonians, Philippians, Hebrews, Revelation, Luke) to define what an "unregenerate" or "sinful" heart is.

From a Torah-only framework, using external scriptures to alter the original terms of the Sinai agreement is the definitive test of a false theological movement.

Deuteronomy 13:1 (12:32 in some prints): "See that you do all I command you; do not add to it or take away from it."

Deuteronomy 13:2-4 explicitly warns that if a teacher arises, performs signs, and uses elegant language to redirect your spiritual focus toward a framework or entity unknown to your ancestors at Sinai, you are commanded to reject it:

"...you must not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer. The Lord your God is testing you to find out whether you love him with all your heart and with all your soul."

The foundational theology of a human "Master/Bridegroom" returning from space to rescue people from a physical world is a total addition to the clear, direct monotheism established at Sinai.

4. The Accusation of "Living in Sin" is Inverted
The post claims that those who reject the Rapture are "living in sin" and "rejecting holiness."

According to the Torah, holiness is explicitly defined as keeping the commandments given at Sinai.

Numbers 15:40: "Then you will remember and obey all my commandments and be holy to your God."

Deuteronomy 6:25: "And if we are careful to obey all this law before the Lord our God, as he has commanded us, that will be our righteousness."

The Pre-Tribulation Rapture doctrine tells believers they are saved and waiting to escape regardless of their adherence to the 613 laws of the Torah. Through a Torah lens, encouraging people to rely on an escape hatch while bypassing the eternal laws of God is the actual path away from biblical holiness.

Conclusion
From the perspective of the Chumash, the entire Pre-Tribulation framework is built on a misunderstanding of God’s nature and covenant. God does not target Israel for ultimate destruction, nor does He ask His people to long for an evacuation from the earth. The ultimate "Blessed Hope" in the Torah is not an escape into the sky; it is the realization of a holy, peaceful society right here on the ground through obedience to the eternal Sinai covenant.

04/07/2026

From a strict Torah-only perspective (the Chumash, the first five books of Moses), the concepts presented in this post—such as a "Pre-Tribulation Rapture," a human "Bridegroom" coming down from heaven to rescue people out of the physical world, and a divine "judgment meant specifically for Israel"—are completely foreign and directly contradict the eternal foundation established by God.

If we examine these claims using only the text of the Torah, we can systematically refute them point by point:

1. God Declares Israel is Eternal, Not a Target for Ultimate Destruction
The post claims that the coming global judgment and worst time in human history is specifically "for Israel." The Torah explicitly rejects the idea that God will ever abandon, replace, or target Israel for permanent destruction or ultimate wrath.

The Eternal Covenant: In Genesis 17:7, God establishes an olam (everlasting/eternal) covenant with Abraham and his descendants.

No Permanent Rejection: Even when looking ahead to times when Israel would sin and be scattered, God guarantees in Leviticus 26:44-45:

"Yet in spite of this, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not reject them or abhor them so as to destroy them completely, breaking my covenant with them. I am the Lord their God."

From a Torah standpoint, Israel is the center of God's covenantal love, not a proxy target left behind for dynamic wrath while a separate group escapes.

2. True Righteousness Means Fixing the World, Not Escaping It
The post emphasizes that the ultimate reward is a "privilege and blessing to be taken out of this world."

The Torah contains zero concepts of a "Rapture" or escaping the physical world to go to heaven. In the Torah, God’s entire objective is for humanity to bring holiness down into this physical world, not to escape it.

The Blueprint is Earthly: The 613 commandments (mitzvot) given in the Torah deal exclusively with physical, earthly actions: farming, justice systems, clothing, food, marriage, and charity.

Deuteronomy 30:11-12: Moses explicitly teaches that spiritual success is not located in heaven:

"Now what I am commanding you today is not too difficult for you or beyond your reach. It is not up in heaven, so that you have to ask, 'Who will ascend into heaven to get it for us...?'"

The ideal servant in the Torah is not someone waiting with packed bags to fly away; it is someone actively building a just, moral society on earth.

3. God Alone is the Savior; There is No Human "Bridegroom" from Heaven
The verses quoted in the post (from the New Testament) direct believers to look for a human savior descending from the sky. The Torah repeatedly establishes a foundational truth: God alone is the Savior, and God is not a man.

No Physical Form: During the revelation at Sinai, the Torah notes that the people saw no physical form, strictly to prevent them from worshiping a human or physical entity. Deuteronomy 4:15: "You saw no form of any kind the day the Lord spoke to you at Horeb out of the fire."

God is Not Human: Numbers 23:19 states clearly: "God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should change His mind."

The Exclusive Savior: The Torah instructs that salvation comes directly from turning back to the One Creator, never through waiting for a secondary mediator or messianic bridegroom to sn**ch people away.

4. The Real "Return" (Teshuvah) is to the Commandments
The post argues that the "Bride" must be ready by loving a specific theological appearance. However, the Torah explicitly defines exactly what "readiness" and "returning to God" looks like. It has nothing to do with waiting for an escape; it means returning to the Sinai laws.

In Deuteronomy 30:2-3, the formula for ultimate redemption is detailed:

"...and when you and your children return to the Lord your God and obey him with all your heart and with all your soul according to everything I command you today... then the Lord your God will restore your fortunes and have compassion on you."

Conclusion
Through the lens of the Torah, the theology of a Pre-Tribulation Rapture fails because it relies on post-biblical texts that alter the core contract made at Sinai.

The Torah does not ask you to look to the sky for a rescue escape from a broken world; it asks you to look down at the text, keep the eternal commandments, and honor the unbreakable covenant with the One True God right here on the ground.

08/06/2026

Here’s a Torah-only refutation of the claim that Jesus fulfilled “300 prophecies,” designed for a Facebook post or comment:

FB Post Reply — Torah Only View

“300 prophecies fulfilled”? Let’s check the first five they always list — through the Torah alone (Genesis–Deuteronomy). No later prophets (Isaiah, Daniel, etc.) count here, because the Torah is the foundation. If Jesus fails the Torah, the rest don’t matter.

1. “Seed of the woman” (Genesis 3:15) — Claim: Jesus crushes Satan’s head.
🔹 Torah says: The “seed” is all humanity, not one man. The verse predicts ongoing hostility between serpents and humans — not a virgin-born messiah. Nowhere does the Torah say the messiah is born of a virgin. Invention.

2. “Descendant of Abraham” (Genesis 12:3) — Claim: Jesus blesses all nations.
🔹 Torah says: Abraham’s physical descendants through Isaac and Jacob receive the blessing by keeping Torah (Genesis 26:5). Jesus’ followers abandoned circumcision, Sabbath, dietary laws → they are cursed per Deuteronomy 27–28, not blessed.

3. “From tribe of Judah” (Genesis 49:10) — Claim: The scepter belongs to Judah, so Jesus is king.
🔹 Torah says: The scepter remains with Judah until Shiloh comes — but Jesus never held a scepter, never ruled from Jerusalem, and the scepter left Judah long before Jesus (Babylonian exile). He failed to restore it.

4. “A prophet like Moses” (Deuteronomy 18:15–19) — Claim: Jesus is that prophet.
🔹 Torah says: The true prophet will speak only what God commands and will never lead Israel away from the Torah (Deuteronomy 13:1–5). Jesus (or his followers) set aside Torah commands (e.g., Mark 7:19 declares all foods clean). That makes him a false prophet by Torah’s own test.

5. “Cursed is anyone hung on a tree” (Deuteronomy 21:23) — Claim: Jesus took the curse for us.
🔹 Torah says: The cursed person is guilty of a capital sin. There is no “taking a curse for someone else” in the Torah. Blood atonement is for animals (Leviticus 17:11), not human sacrifice. A cursed, crucified man is disqualified from being messiah — period.

Bottom line: The 300 “prophecies” come mostly from Psalms, Isaiah, Daniel — books the Torah doesn’t elevate above Moses. But the Torah alone already disqualifies Jesus on lineage, law-keeping, and death by hanging. You can’t claim “fulfilled prophecy” if you start by ignoring what God actually said through Moses.

📖 Deuteronomy 4:2 — “Do not add to what I command you.”

From a Torah only perspective the New Testament claims about Jesus is impossible since it explicitly say, God is one, He...
07/06/2026

From a Torah only perspective the New Testament claims about Jesus is impossible since it explicitly say, God is one, He is not a man that He should lie and He does not change and neither does His covenant with Israel.

If you appreciate my efforts consider a donation at Paypal: [email protected].

06/06/2026
When studying the commanded conditions of how and where sacrifices were to be made one can not help but wonder about the...
05/06/2026

When studying the commanded conditions of how and where sacrifices were to be made one can not help but wonder about the practice of crucifixion. It is difficult to reconcile it with the scene one would encounter in the wilderness tabernacle.

Please consider a donation on Paypal: justice. j. [email protected].

Many spiritual leaders over the last six thousand years claimed special revelations but none of those compare to the sce...
05/06/2026

Many spiritual leaders over the last six thousand years claimed special revelations but none of those compare to the scene described in Exodus 19 where God spoke out of the burning mountain.

Please consider a donation on Paypal: [email protected].

Egypt is covered in frogs but Pharaoh is content to let his people suffer another night before Moses can pray and have t...
03/06/2026

Egypt is covered in frogs but Pharaoh is content to let his people suffer another night before Moses can pray and have the frogs removed. Its crazy and yet millions of people exist under difficult conditions just because they delay the actions that could set them free. Stop procrastinating and choose life!

Please consider a donation at Paypal: justice. j. [email protected].

Address

406 West Street, Pretoria North
Pretoria
0116

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Revisiting the inerrant Bible, a fresh perspective posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share